It was
unbelievable how similar the lions were to domestic cats. This is shown through
my video. I wanted to focus on their traits and movements, which was hard as
they spent most of the day sleeping! I used an upbeat track to create a fast
cutting pace and tried to show different angles and shots to match the beat of
the music.
Friday, 1 June 2012
Beside the Lions
I followed my
plan, went quickly around the zoo until I found a good viewpoint, which I found
within 20 minuets at the lion enclosure. Due to the rain the lions had moved to
the sheltered side of the cage and presses themselves against the glass. There
were two large females and two female cubs, not yet reached adulthood. I could
see every hair on their backs, the hard texture of their dark paws and their
soft black noses. I stayed at lion exhibit for over two hours, observing them,
photographing and filming.
Thursday, 31 May 2012
Trip to London Zoo
A few days after
the aquarium I set off for London Zoo. I only took two wrong turns - a personal record for me, so luck seemed to be on my side. The weather however was not! It rained so heavily I practically had to swim to get inside the gates! Still, every cloud has a silver lining – the more rain, the less tourists! So I
devised a plan, divide and conquer! I figured wiz around the zoo. Stop briefly
at each enclosure for photo opportunities. If the animals were close to the bars stay, if not move on and
return later! Here are some examples of photos:

Friday, 25 May 2012
Fish in Movement
What struck me about this particular fish was its
vibrant scales and agile movements. It’s body was constantly changing as the
light bounced off it’s scales, revealing a variety of colours and shades that
merged into each other and then were gone, disappearing in the blink of an eye.
I used a slow shutter speed to try and capture the
movement and colours of the fish, abstracting the body and focusing instead on
the intense shades.
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
Footage from London Aquarium
I found it hard to show the elegance and grace of
the fish's movements through photography. Here is a short selection of
footage that looks at the behaviour and movement of the fish. I found it hard
to film the fish with my hand held camera, I don't have the steadiest hand and
this is the first time I’ve used it. But I do like the intense blue of the
water and the light breaking the surface. I also like that it is out of focus
at times because I think it adds a sense of mystery and magic to the scene.
It’s very dream like and therapeutic with the soft music. The piece has a
high contrast, accentuating the light bouncing off the fishes' scales.
Monday, 21 May 2012
Trip to the Aquarium

I went home to London this week to see the family,
and of course to take a trip to the Aquarium and London Zoo. In all honestly I
didn’t have a strict plan of what I wanted to achieve by visiting these
organizations. I figured inspiration would suddenly hit me whilst walking
around the enclosures…
And luckily it did! The intense colours and
patterns of the various fish captivated me. There was so much going on that my
eyes didn't know where to focus. I photographed and videoed the various
movements, patterns and textures of the tropical fish. Here are a few examples…
Friday, 18 May 2012
The World in our Hands
The Natural History Museum Wildlife Photographer
of the Year exhibition.
Every year I go to the Wildlife Photographer
of the Year exhibition and every year I’m blown away by the beauty, quality and
originality of the photographs submitted. For me the annual exhibition never
gets old. There are a variety of categories from animal portrait to underwater worlds.
But it’s thecategory that shocks me and stays
in my mind the longest. The photographs are extremely powerful and thought-provoking.
They draw attention to the cruel state of the world and how man has monopolized
the planet, destroying everything that gets in his way The images are almost
always pessimistic, aimed to create awareness, which will hopefully inspire
people to change the way they live and protect what we have.
But I wonder if I – and other people – have
become immune to images like this? Have I seen so many disturbing photographs
that I’ve become desensitized? Will I really remember these images after I’ve
left the exhibition? I do want things to change, but do I really want to change
the way I live? I suppose I question what I or anyone else can really do. Is
buying free-range eggs or haddock instead of cod or animal friendly skin care
really enough anymore? And why do I do that anyway? Is it just to make me feel
good about myself, to think I’m changing the planet, slowly but surely? I guess
what I’m saying is – I think these photographers are really good at getting
people to think, but will it actually make a difference? Anyway, that’s a
completely different topic, and I don’t have any answers, just conflicting
views that go round in circles.
The photographers use a number of techniques
to create awareness and sympathy for the endangered animals and wildlife. Some
show humans very obvious mark on the planet, for example the lone tree
surrounded by tier tracks. The image is cut in half showing the before and
after state of the forest. The reflection of the tree in the muddy puddle is a
window into the future, showing us the forest’s fate, soon all that’ll be left
of this beautiful woodland is churned waterlogged earth. 
Frederic Larrey’s photograph of the fisherman and the reflected fish is beautifully shot, taken from and unusual and intriguing angle. The reflection distorts the fish, blending them into the water. Like the previous image, the composition is split in two, with nature on one side and man on the other. The net looks like patterned cloth blowing in the wind, and at first glance I focus on the textures and colours of the fish. However, the darkness at the top of the net spreads over them, bringing an ominous feel to the piece. The shadows of the net are encaging the fish, taking them away from the calm water and into the waiting fisherman’s arms.
Wednesday, 16 May 2012
Kai Fagerström - Photographer
The House in the Woods

I've looked at animals being photographed
in the wild by Nick Brandt and Steve Bloom, and in captivity by Britta
Jaschinski. Now I want to compare my findings to wild animals in an urban
landscape, opposed to the beautiful settings of Africa and gloomy corners of
the zoo.
Kai
Fagerström is a Finnish documentary photographer. His photographic series, “The
House in the Woods”, documents the inhibitants of an old, crumbling and deserted
house in the woods, near Salo, Finland. The isolated house is probably at least
200 years old, with its last dwellers moving out more than 30 years ago. Who
were the last inhabitants and where are they now? “It's as though time stood
still.” They left behind many of their previous belongings, old-fashioned
lampshades, tables and chairs, lying dust covered on the floorboards. The house
has weathered over time, taken over by the wood, the wind freely blowing its leaves
around the kitchen and the rain never fails to drip through the holes in the
roof. The cracked peeling walls, creaking floorboards, and dirty smashed
windows seem to have their own life, turning the house into a reflection of the
wild woods outside.
However
the house is not as concealed as you may think, for when dusk falls on the
gloomy stone walls, life suddenly takes over. The various creatures in the woods
make their way back home. The raccoon family has their own private entrance to
the house, the fireplace. Red squirrels busy themselves in their nests in the
kitchen and badgers shuffle around under the floorboards. The house offers them
shelter from the harsh winter winds, a safe place from the watchful eyes of the
ever-hungry birds of prey. This house is their home.

Fagerström
spent a lot of time at the house, once daylight has slipped away. He patiently
waited for the animals to appear, wanting to photograph their goings-on and
everyday activities. He says that at night, “the light can be beautiful.” The
creatures that inhabit the house stop by the same time every evening, though
some are more photo-shy than others. The owl seemed to know his way round the
house, as if he'd lived there previously, now become more of a passing visitor;
“It wasn't too shy, so photographing it was quite easy." He lured the
animals into particular positions, tempting them with nuts and food, so he can
get his ideal compositions.
I love
the atmosphere of Fagerström’s photographs. The house seems beautifully quiet
and peaceful, with the yellow light bouncing off the walls, giving a sense of
safety and security. Like the other photographers, Fagerström humanises the
animals, however in a completely different way. Rather than trying to show their
expressions of pains, sorrows or empowerment, through portrait-like photography,
Fagerström focuses on the documentary side, looking at their home life and
behaviour. The animals look content in
this man-made environment, as though it is of their own making. This makes me
relate to my every day routines at
home; the image of the red squirrel peering out of the window looks as though
he's waiting for a friend to arrive for lunch.
The dark
lighting in the images is perfect, it doesn't expose or illuminate the animals
too much, creating a sense of mystery and anticipation. Fagerström respects
their space and is very much an onlooker on the scene, rather than an intruder.
The creatures seem very content with their secret hideaway. Although they are
living in the ruins of an old human dwelling, let's just hope that Fagerström
is the only person to discover their hidden home.
Monday, 14 May 2012
Wildlife Photographer - Britta Jaschinski
I first saw Britta Jaschinski's work at the
Wildlife photography of the year exhibition at the Natural History museum last
year. To me, her black and white Lion portrait holds so many emotions, whilst
demonstrating her eye for beauty and skills as a photographer. The image is out
of focus, grainy and very high contrast, which is how I was taught not to take a photograph in my A-level photography
class! However I believe all this adds to the emotional impact of the image.
She has captured a fleeting moment of the lion, showing how rare it is to see
such a beautiful creature from such a close
proximity. The off focus and high contrast of the image emphasizes the elegance
and texture of the lion's mane. Most of the lion's body is engulfed in blackness,
which to me provokes an eerie feeling about how African animals are starting to
slip away, leaving behind just brief glimpses and fading memories from old
photographs.
Her Zoo Project -
Like me, Britta Jaschinski's photographic projects,
to explore animals in captivity, were developed at London Zoo. She photographed
animals in zoos, focusing more on their portraits and personalities than
documentation. In an interview Britta says "the more photos depicting the
truth about captive animal, the better". She feels very strongly that zoos
are wrong which was reflected in her work; "the subject matter of zoo is a
very depressing one for me. Much pain swept through my lens and a lot of that
agony created those images. I framed boredom, frustration and insane animals
and I wouldn't ever know how to produce a bright image on that."
Jaschinski felt "naturally drawn towards
animals" and started off by documenting the treatment of them in farms, slaughterhouses
and animal testing laboratories. On her first trip London Zoo she says she,
"spent hours taking photos and when I processed the film I was shocked
about my discovery"..."And here it was, right front me - my own
photos explain to me why I felt depressed about the fate of these sentiment
beings who had been incarcerated in the name of education in conversation. Each
of the species is locked into a version of hell, purely for entertainment. From
then on I felt it was my duty to visit more and more zoos to investigate
whether the are actually zoos that play an active role in the education and
conserving."
Jaschinski's use of black-and-white engulfs the
animals, creating a dark pessimistic atmosphere; her photographs show a bleak and
melancholy look on animals in captivity. They hold a sense of unease, making
the viewer feel slightly uncomfortable. You are more able to sympathise with
the animals, because the style of the photographs are more like portraits, than
documentary. This humanizes the animals, showing them in states, such as
isolation and frustration, to which we can relate... They look as though
they’ve given up on the world, and all that is left is a meaningless existence,
for the satisfaction of people’s need
for entertainment. They seem like empty shells with no life left in them, just staring
helplessly into space; even the
structure of the composition locks the animals in a rectangular cage.


The unnatural urban environment stands out as an
oddity, as we’re used to seeing photographs of animals in their natural
environment. But who knows, maybe in the future this is the only way animals
will be perceived, in an urban landscape surrounded by metal bars or thick
scratched, scarred glass.
Friday, 11 May 2012
New Project Brief
Now that Bristol Zoo has rejected my volunteering
application I have to find another activity to take up my time during these
next few weeks. After much consideration I decided to stay on the animals in
captivity though process and take trips to Bristol and London Zoo where i can
photograph and sketch animal activities.
Since looking at the work of wildlife photographer;
and understanding the increasing risk of extinction, I’ve become more and
more interested in the comparison between animals in captivity and animals in
the wild. I put some of my thoughts to paper with a spider diagram...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















